The American Conservative Party

Facebook PagetwitterLinkedIn YouTube ChannelRSS Feed

Change your Bookmarks!

We've updated our Website at:

americanconservativeparty.org 

Blog
This Commentary comes from our National and State Leaderships.  The feed to the right is from our membership at large. Even though the internal commentary is moderated (and the feed, of course, is not) not all views and expressions on this section of the site or the linked blogs will necessarily reflect any official position of the American Conservative Party or its leadership.  For more commentary, (and to relay your own thoughts, State or National) please visit our forums.

Move-on-up.org "Meet me in St. Louis" Print E-mail
Written by Kenneth McClenton   
Monday, 25 July 2011 19:04

It is easy to point to Frederick Douglas as the statesman orator called of God for the periods of Slavery, the Civil War and the Reconstruction.  His Radical Republicanism secured the suffrage of freedmen and women alike.  Yet, each Father of an Age bears Sons of the following Age.  Upon the shoulders of Douglas, stand Booker T. Washington, Marcus Garvey and W. E. B. DuBois.  Classical Republican Booker T. Washington sought assimilation through academic access, entrepreneurial risk and legal remedy.  Capitalist Marcus Garvey sought empowerment for men of color through the isolation of a single race into a large governing force that would operate out of Africa.  W. E. B. DuBois, an enemy of both Classical Republican Washington and Capitalist Garvey, sought empowerment through a Marxist, socialist movement of unification that adopted that pursuit of civil and human rights by legal remedy for every interest group.  Their impacts have dominated groups think in Afro-America for nearly a century.  Booker T. Washington can be pinpointed for Martin L. King, Jr. and trove of academicians, scholars and Fortune 500 business leaders.  Garvey can be pinpointed for Malcolm X and a host of financial and government leaders around the world.  DuBois can be pinpointed for Barack Hussein Obama II, President of the United States.  Ever different in their pursuits, ideologies and distinctions, they form a tremendous base to the pyramid of cultural success.

 

     There is a move of man, ever massive, that will supersede even the works of the aforementioned men.  No one man will symbolize the greatest moment in American history when men of color see themselves freed by the ordained right of God and not the political rulings of men. While greatness has been thrust upon many an individual to lead a people that were not a people, this is the season by which Fathers will be raised from the dearth of the present to build upon the foundations of life, liberty and the pursuit of personal property.  Undeterred by fear or heartened intimidation, the Fathers shall be called upon to beat the swords of past hopeless battles and misguided allegiances into the plowshares of cultural prominence.  We build memorials to the work and accomplishments of past leaders, of slaves long lost to the sins of merchants and politicians and of the losses for which no justice can aptly apply.  Sons shall be born to promote the freedom of thought, the liberty of devotion and the will of life.  I am an Apologist not an Apologizer.  I can without fail defend my Faith and my belief upon which a Constitution has stood since 1788.  My eyes are worn and heart rent for the past.  However, I cannot change the truth of the past nor seek I the comfort of victimhood in its narrative.  No living man can possibly remedy with pure equality nor shall we expect such profit for an injury not personally suffered.  If in Faith, I have been forgiven then by Faith, I forgive.  The Age of the Fractured Democracy has ended.  The Promise of a Representative Republic is born in the celebration of the life of Sherman Parker [http://www.shermanparker.org/bio.htm].

 

     MEET ME IN ST. LOUIS (http://mopns.com/2011/07/18/meet-me-in-st-louis-conference-not-just...) is the evolution of the MOVEMENT.   I am frail in words when I think of the significance of this event.  I think of old conservatives like Christopher Arps and myself whom have endured years of savage assault of speech and utter disdain from many in our homes, neighborhoods, communities, workplaces and even churches simply because we believed that we were free and ordained of God never to let the confines of what a man thought of us to ensnare the thoughts that God had towards us.  I think of young conservatives like Shelby Emmitt and Allan Poteshman that have been persecuted by their peers and berated by those that they love simply because they stand firm in their reverence for the principles held dear in the Constitution and the tenets of their conservative beliefs.  I am excited because we will become ONE in St. Louis.  I suppose that this feeling is related to what the Prophet Elijah must have felt.

 

Then Elijah said to them, “I am the only one of the LORD’s prophets left,

but Baal has four hundred and fifty prophets.  (1 Kings 18:18)

 

You know that there are other conservatives out there.  You have even met one before in a community event or local celebration.  You have heard rumors that over 800,000 African-Americans voted against President Obama.  Yet, something makes you feel that you are alone.  The battlefield is so wide open that you can only see the enemy.  For every blog you write, ten (10) are written against you.  For every Letter to the Editor that you correspond, there are one (100) hundred no thank-you’s.  Polls provoke you with their hearty message that over ninety percent (90%) of your peers believe that Obama can do no wrong and that you are out of step with society.  The isolation is amplified in the inner cities when you realize that your city council and mayor can hardly share a bagel with you at breakfast and certainly does not want to hear your tax-less strategy for improving schools, amplifying economic activity and reducing the size and scope of governance.  You might as well have robbed him of his dignity, degrees and corporate contributions.  Today is different.  There is a promise of unity.  Not a mere unity centered on a common man with a wonderful idea.  It is centered on a belief that is as pure as the Faith that my Creator gave me at the Beginning.

 

 

     Over the past few weeks, I have tried to point people in the direction of people that share their belief on how a government should run, how taxes should be collected and how the liberties of the private person should be protected.  I have offered E. W. Jackson (http://www.blogtalkradio.com/ac-nation/2011/07/12/the-exceptional-c...) whom is quietly building his campaign in Virginia for US Senate.  I have offered Scott D’Amboise (http://www.blogtalkradio.com/ac-nation/2011/07/19/the-exceptional-c...) whom is winning the hearts and minds of voters in Maine in his Senate campaign against Olympia Snowe.  I do not offer them to the world because of their gender, their race or their entitlement.  They are offered for a belief that is as universal to the brother watching Major League Baseball, the sister at the NASCAR Race, the father in the kitchen preparing the Sunday dinner or the Mother weaving baskets at the Thursday Morning Gathering to help our US Veterans.  It is universal because such is liberty.   The Move-On-Up.Org Conference in August is more than a group of people coming together to celebrate and network.  It is the communion that our Founding Fathers imagined.  It is the fellowship that we speak of when we shall all make it to Heaven.  It is the day that black man and white man, Jew and Gentile will turn to each other and proclaim that Freedom Rings. 

 

     My writings over the next few days will examine the historical importance of the Conference.  I will compare and contrast it with the laden foundations of the Niagara Movement.  I will express the foundations of conservatism as explicitly as possible.  I will speak to the racial timidity of such an advance in politics.  I will also discuss the need to disavow our desire to be loved by the media and by our family, friends and co-workers that possess an affinity for tyranny in its varied static forms.  I will begin that work by referring to quotation often overlooked but prescient for the moment:

 

For whosoever shall do the will of my Father which is in heaven,

the same is my brother, and sister, and mother.  (Matthew 12:50)

 

If it was so important for Jesus that the will of His Father be done then, imagine how important it was for the will of our Founding Fathers to be done.  The Last Will of those men is the US Constitution.  If its execution is impure then, there must by a sacred remedy?  Indeed, it is.  It is you!  Over a million men traveled to Washington to hear the victim centered ravings of progressive ideologues.  They came.  They pledged to be better Fathers and more involved in the community.  They returned.  The problems grew.  However, a progressive ideologue was elected President of the United States.  This historic event is essential to reversing the curse upon a maligned people.  You are the remnant that must come and stir the spirit of America.  Let this be the moment that you depart from the confines of isolation in thought, deed and speech.  Find a way to make it to the Conference (www.meetmeinstl-efbevent.eventbrite.com).  In the words of the great Negro singer, “I don’t care how you get here, just get here if you can.”

 
The Green Generation Print E-mail
Written by Lee Anderson   
Monday, 25 July 2011 18:59

In the line at the store, I overheard the cashier telling an older woman that she should bring her own grocery bags because plastic bags weren't good for the environment. The woman apologized to him and explained, "We didn't have the green thing back in my day." The clerk responded, "That's our problem today.  Your generation did not care enough to save our environment."

He was right - my parent's generation didn't have the green thing in its day. When they grew up, and myself in my childhood years, we returned milk bottles, soda bottles and beer bottles to the store. We didn't need a country recycling program. The store sent them back to the plant to be washed and sterilized and refilled, so it could use the same bottles over and over.  So they really were recycled. But we didn't have the green thing back in our day.

We walked up stairs, because we didn't have an escalator in every store and office building. We walked to the corner grocery store and didn't climb into a 300-horsepower SUV every time we had to go two blocks. But we didn't have the green thing in our day.

Back then, we washed the baby's diapers because we didn't have the throw-away kind.  We dried clothes on a line, not in an energy gobbling 220 volts dryer - wind and solar power really did dry the clothes. Kids got hand-me-down clothes from their brothers or sisters, not always brand-new clothing. Today communities ban clothes line drying and jeans with holes cost $200. But we didn't have the green thing back in our day.

Back then, we had one TV, or radio, in the house -- not a TV in every room. And the TV had a smaller screen - not not a screen the size of an elephant. In the kitchen, we blended and stirred by hand because we didn't have electric machines to do everything for us. When we packaged a fragile item to send in the mail, we used a wadded up old newspaper to cushion it, not Styrofoam p-nuts or plastic bubble wrap. Nor did we fire up an engine and burn gasoline just to cut the lawn. We used a push mower that ran on human power.  Every family had a garden. We exercised by working so we didn't need to go to a health club to run on treadmills that operate on electricity. But we didn't have the green thing back then.

We drank from a fountain when we were thirsty instead of using a cup or a plastic bottle every time we had a drink of water. We refilled writing pens with ink instead of buying a new pen, and we replaced the razor blades in a razor (or sharpened a straight razor) instead of throwing away the whole razor just because the blade got dull. But we didn't have the green thing back then.

Back then, people took the streetcar or a bus and kids rode their bikes to school or walked instead of turning their moms into a 24-hour taxi service. We played sports on the nearest lot, and came home when it was dark. Today you pay to play and kid's games run to 10 PM, lighted by megawatt field lights. We had one electrical outlet in a room, not an entire bank of sockets to power a dozen mobile appliances. But we didn't have the green thing back then.

Going green doesn't require the UN, international treaties, or federal laws or government assistance. It just requires simple common sense and personal choice.

{Comment on this article HERE.}

 
Understanding Compulsive Liars Print E-mail
Written by Lee Anderson   
Monday, 18 July 2011 14:12
In a 2003 Psychology Today article titled "Understanding Compulsive Liars", Robert Reich, M.D., a New York City psychiatrist and expert in psychopathology, says compulsive lying has no official diagnosis. Instead, intentional dissimulation -- not the kind associated with dementia or brain injury -- is associated with a range of diagnoses, such as antisocial, borderline and narcissistic personality disorders. When it comes to compulsive liars, says Charles Ford, a professor of psychiatry at the University of Alabama Birmingham, "words seem to flow out of their mouths without them thinking about it." To understand the mind of a fake, Reich suggests considering what lying does for the liar. Deceit as a means to an end -- like lying to get a job -- is easy to comprehend. Much harder to spot, he says, is lying "for primary gains": deceptions that create a different sense of self without any immediate benefit. "It has to do with self-esteem," Reich says. "You want to be like someone else because you aren't very happy with yourself."

CBS news has reported that President Obama stated that, "Americans back me on debt deal.... My Republican friends have said that they're not willing to do revenues, and they have repeated that on several occasions," he told reporters at a news conference in Washington. "My hope, though, is that they're listening not just to lobbyists or special interests here in Washington, but they're also listening to the American people. Because it turns out, poll after poll, many done by your organizations, show that it's not just Democrats who think we need to take a balanced approach, it's Republicans as well."

So what do the polls really show?

A Gallup poll released Wednesday concluded that 50% of Americans want the majority of deficit reduction to come through spending cuts; only 32% favor some combination of reduced expenditures coupled with higher revenues. Even a smaller 11% favored mostly or only tax increases.

The Ipsos/Reuters poll found that 71% of those surveyed oppose increasing the debt limit. This was true even of the half sample who were told that "not raising the debt limit would damage the US' sovereign debt rating, which is like our credit rating: it would seriously damage our credibility abroad, would make it much more difficult for us to borrow in the future, and would likely push up interest rates."

In a June 9 survey by the independent Quinnipiac University poll, paints a bleaker picture:
  • 60% disapproved of the way Barack Obama is handling the budget deficit
  • 90% rated the nation's economy these days as not so good or poor
  • 75% said the nation's economy is getting  getting worse or staying about the same
  • 71% think the United States economy is in a recession
  • 53% think President Obama's proposals to raise revenues are are tax hikes or do not believe they are closing loopholes
  • 55% said they trust someone other than the President in handling the economy
  • 52% said they would not blame the Republicans if the debt ceiling is not raised

(For more detail on the Quinnipiac poll refer to the data and questions asked here:
http://www.quinnipiac.edu/images/polling/us/us07142011.doc)

So what are we to conclude? Our President is unhappy. He is a fake. He is a compulsive liar. Of course, CBS news is happy to accommodate the lie and enable the compulsion. The trouble with lying is that it catches up with you sooner or later.

{Comment on this article HERE.}

 
Better Question: Do these guys even give a flip? Print E-mail
Written by Butch Porter   
Monday, 18 July 2011 14:03

{Written by LogiPundit}

Republican...Leadership? Pat Caddell asked a rather interesting question on Fox News the other day: “Does this guy have any idea what he is doing?” Referring to the President, of course, he expresses frustration (much as he did with Jimmy Carter) with wondering why “his guy” was not willing to take a leadership role and get something accomplished. Watch the entire video.

Pat Caddell On Obama: “Does This Guy Have Any Idea What He Is Doing?”.

Another issue he mentions is that the two parties–as a whole–are showing how little they really know what they are doing. Now other than the fact that this a subject that is popular with your humble author, it bears exploration. In what way are the Democrats…AND the Republicans illustrating exactly how little they know about what they’re doing when it comes to budget?  I’ll offer ten points on why I don’t believe that either Party, nor any of its leaders, are taking budget talks seriously:

  1. They are talking about reforming the tax code as a part of a comprehensive debt reduction plan.–moronic. Unnecessary. Cut spending.
  2. They are not serious about finding efficiencies and cuts in military spending–they are there. Everyone knows they are there. Republicans should put them on the table.
  3. They are talking too much about entitlements, and not enough about current spending.–long term deficits: entitlements. Short-term deficits: other stuff. It’s pretty simple. Cut spending.
  4. Republicans brought abortion into the mix (not the current talks, but the previous ones on the 2011 budget).–not a fan of abortion…certainly not a fan of Planned Parenthood…but when you’re talking budget issues, you should focus on the things that can actually affect the budget.
  5. No serious talk of cost of Federal Employees. Salaries, benefits, pensions, etc.–NEVER discussed as an important point in budget discussions. Local Governments, State Governments, and school systems across the country HAVE to look at their employees pay and total compensation packages, and when they do, they receive a huge amount of hell from both sides of the budget issue…but if they have to make cuts they have to make cuts. Our Federal Government has to do the same. That goes for employees and contractors.
  6. The President hasn’t even mentioned or alluded to his debt commission–why bother with the debt commission if you’re going to ignore all of it?
  7. And lastly, why not bring up the fact that the United States Federal Government is involved in things domestically that it shouldn’t be involved with…like entire Departments of the Federal Government that shouldn’t exist as Departments at all because they are not core functions of the Federal Government (Education, Energy, Labor, etc), and the States can handle them.
  8. And speaking of, why not bring up the approximately $550B dollars in State aid…that’s right…$550B dollars in transfer payments to states…EVERY YEAR.
  9. And while we’re speaking of Federal Aid, what about the $45 Billion in Foreign Military and Economic assistance that we give away every year.  That should at least warrant a glance, shouldn’t it?
  10. Yachts and corporate jets? REALLY?  That’s your position.  That the evil rich folk aren’t paying enough.

 

I’ve said it before: AUSTERITY. It’s required. These are times that require a serious look at the budget, and NONE of these guys are taking it seriously.  Contrast this with British cuts last year:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/10/20/AR2...

The New York Times asked whether Armageddon would ensue if similar cuts were enacted here:

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/24/weekinreview/24herzenhorn.html

In case you missed it:

The British plan includes a few increases, notably for the government-run health care system. Almost all other departments would face a freeze or cuts, resulting in an average reduction of 19 percent; 490,000 public jobs would be eliminated. Even the military and support for the royal family would face reductions. The austerity program is the most drastic in Britain in 60 years, and it is difficult to envision something at the same scale in the United States. Some economists say it would also be ill-advised, because such a quick contraction of government spending by the United States would reverberate forcefully across the world economy and risk another recession.

Average deduction of 19%.  490,000 jobs.  And this 19% is WITH INCREASES to their health care system. Personally, I’m not a fan of a NHS (or tax hikes), but I’m not British, so I don’t get to call that shot. They prioritized and they cut DRASTICALLY, because they looked at what was happening in Greece and other parts of Europe.

The difference between the British approach to the budget (similar-sized deficit from a percentage of GDP standpoint, and over a similar amount of time)?

They took this stuff seriously.  They cut support for the ROYAL FAMILY.  Wonder if Congress is entertaining cuts to itself? They seem to THINK they’re royalty; maybe they’d take Her Majesty’s example to heart.

All that to say: these guys (the U.S. Congress and White House) are NOT really serious about cutting the budget.  EVERYTHING they do is politics now.  The only reason that Republicans in Congress are holding the lines on taxes is because they believe that their political futures depend on it.  And it does.  And, for the same reason, Obama is picking on yacth owners and corporate jet users, because he’s pandering to the “working class” (because as everyone knows, people who fly corporate jets don’t really WORK).

It’s all pandering.  They’re not even close to serious…none of them are. It’s a joke, and everyone knows it.

Well, we’re done joking.  Both parties and their leaderships have already been deemed useless by me, and many like me.  As Caddell says, that sentiment is going to continue to grow, and grow, and grow, if they don’t look around and take their jobs seriously.

{Comment on this article HERE}

 
Veterans: No Jesus or God for You Print E-mail
Written by Lee Anderson   
Friday, 08 July 2011 17:33

Veterans in Houston say the Department of Veterans Affairs is consistently censoring their prayers by banning them from saying the words "God" and "Jesus" during funeral services at Houston National Cemetery.

Three organizations -- the Veterans of Foreign Wars, The American Legion and the National Memorial Ladies -- allege that the cemetery's director and other government officials have created "religious hostility" at the cemetery.

 

This isn't the first time the Department of Veterans Affairs has attempted to censor a burial service.Read more.

 


Page 4 of 25

Email Updates

State *


You are here  :
Paid for by the American Conservative Committee (www.theamericanconservatives.org; 1900 Campus Commons Dr., Suite 100; Reston, VA  20191) and not authorized by any Federal Candidate.
Contributions to the American Conservative Committee (American Conservative Party, Inc) are not tax deductible for individual income tax purposes.