|
Board of Director Elections |
|
|
|
|
Written by TracyCoyle
|
|
Friday, 02 March 2012 03:07 |
|
UPDATE: Voting online now at VIZU until 9pm EST on March 15th. If you're qualified to vote (NLC or Board), please send a note to
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
to get the password. If you haven't renewed for 2012 yet, please JOIN HERE. Nominees for the 2012/2013 biennium are: Darrin Dickey (TN), Jeremy Schwanbeck (GA), Kirk Spears (GA), Tim Miller (MT), Allan Poteshman (MD), Ric Webb (SC), Ed Koeder, Jr (MS).
That time of year for elections. We have open positions on the Board of Directors and officers to elect. Nomination period is open for the next 7 days. Nominations must be submitted with personal contact information to the Chairman by midnight on March 7, 2012. Voting by all members will begin on March 8th. Now is the time to get involved. - To be a candidate for election to the Board of Directors, the party member must be a supporting member by February 1 of the year nominated for the board, plus qualify under at least one of the following criteria:
- A current or past member of the NLC, including terms prior to the adoption of these by-laws.
- A current or past member of a standing or ad hoc committee of the ACP, including terms prior to the adoption of these by-laws.
- A current or past board member, including terms prior to the adoption of these by-laws.
- Approved by the Nomination Committee.
Nominations needing approval of the Nomination Committee need to forward their nominations before Sunday, March 4th. The following is the current Board of Directors with the year their term expires: - Butch Porter, 2013
- Tracy Coyle, 2013
- Darrin Dickey, 2012
- Jason Hale, 2013
- Lee Anderson, 2012
- Ed Koeder, Jr, 2012
- Bill Hinman, 2013
- Ken McClenton, 2013
- Tim Miller, 2012
- Sonny Sander, 2012
- Jeremy Schwanbeck, 2012
- Ray Spitzer, 2013
- Kirk Spears, 2012
- David Terry, 2013
|
|
Last Updated on Friday, 09 March 2012 00:27 |
|
|
A balance to freedom and constraint |
|
|
|
|
Written by TracyCoyle
|
|
Wednesday, 01 February 2012 04:05 |
|
Many thanks to Butch Porter for sending the following to me. Over the years, Butch and I have had many conversations concerning the nature and substance of 'conservative' and how it applies here in the activities and philosophy that underpin our Party. My own efforts and defining certain aspects can be found in my book, but there are many other sources that do quite a grand job also. This short essay, A Conservative Case for Freedom is from M. Stanton Evans in 1960 (ht to Jay Casale for sending it Butch's way first). This is the link to the essay and I am going to excerpt a little of it. The authoritarian believes in the objective order, and is generally ready to limit individual freedom to follow its prescriptions. He prefers a hierarchical to a fluid society, conceiving some men as destined to rule, others to obey-all ordained by the objective order.
This is fact the argument Edmund Burke makes while stating his positions on ordered liberty - something many conservatives approve of. I do not agree with either ordered liberty as a concept and certainly not the idea that I need an hierarchy above me to guide me. The Manchesterians allege that man’s self-interest, which flourishes under a regime of freedom, is sufficient sanction to keep liberty intact. But that calculus of desires is too subtle for most of mankind. It is the immemorial habit of man to be unable to see his long-term interest when a short-term one looms before him. I acknowledge that FOR ME, this
man’s self-interest, which flourishes under a regime of freedom, is sufficient sanction to keep liberty intact is correct. However, one issue that I bring up often -Tracyism Rule #1: always act in your own best interest - is so seldom actually done by the majority that the second part of above:
It is the immemorial habit of man to be unable to see his long-term interest when a short-term one looms before him. is the more common outcome. I require moral people because most people are 'human nature being what it is, is short term, sole benefit at the expense of others' oriented.I want to tie this to the current political/primary. Our short term interests and what is in our long term interests are reaching a point of breaking. Many of us want a conservative to run against Obama, but that is more and more looking unlikely (yea for the ACP!! ok, short term interest...) and yet, how do we vote for someone that we feel is least likely to hold to the banner of conservative principle and still defeat Obama, who most certainly is not in our long term interest. Four years ago, I and many of the founders of this party faced that question with the effort to build this party. Some voted for McCain, many did not vote at all (I didn't). In many regards we are facing a similar situation again. I have decided I will NOT vote for a candidate that fails to meet even the basic concepts of conservatism even if the result is Obama getting a second term. For me, my long term interest is in the liberty and freedom we were endowed with and voting against it, even for a short term benefit, just doesn't fit with my idea of Conservative. |
|
Last Updated on Friday, 02 March 2012 04:15 |
|
Written by Kenneth McClenton
|
|
Thursday, 08 December 2011 00:00 |
..."the Cowards are Here, the Cowards are Here!" From the Desk of the Exceptional Conservative This is not the usual writing of a poetic sophist heaving grandeur political concepts upon the audience of Urban listeners and readers. I will not begin with niceties and sincere appeals. CONSERVATIVES, we are at full fledged war with attacks from within and without. You may appreciate the daily punitive assaults upon our principles and our people by the Media and the Left (Democrats, Socialists, Communists, Anarchists, Marxists, Occupiers, etc.). If for the first time in the history of this Great Nation that our Credit Rating was downgraded then, it is the Tea Party’s and Conservatives’ fault. If you can not pass a budget in nearly 1,000 days, even when you had a Democrat House and a Democrat Senate, then, it’s the Tea Party’s fault. If the plumbing goes bad in your house, Blame Bush or the Tea Party Conservatives. Screw Transparency! You don’t need a mercury-filled light bulb from General Electric China to know that the enemy of your enemy is still your enemy in the Democrat Coalition. Whether it’s the die-hard Klansman or the caring La Raza patron who believes that additional government funding is needed to support black fathers because they do not have the moral fiber to stay home with their children, you expect slights and intelligentsia breaches moment by moment. You know that when you attend a conservative event in Washington that Occupiers will push old people down stairsonto the Urban pavement or will build tenement shelter without permit on federal lands. WE expect this and we get it! We fight back. We unify and we employ the Constitution to defeat our enemies. November 2010 is an example of the magnificent powers of Tea Party Conservatives to repel the enemy! |
|
Last Updated on Friday, 16 December 2011 04:22 |
|
Read more...
|
|
Written by The ACP
|
|
Thursday, 24 November 2011 00:00 |
|
If you take the time to Google "Real Story of Thanksgiving" it's amazing the variety of things that come up: From the "Pilgrims were bloodthirsty murderers": http://www.manataka.org/page269.html http://www.danielnpaul.com/TheR...sgiving.html To the "Pilgrims were not capable of tying their own shoes and the Indians had to save them" (which contrary to the article's assertions...is EXACTLY what we learn in school now): http://www.columbiatribune.com/...iving-myths/ To the "Pilgrims found out that Socialism didn't work”: How Private Property Saved the Pilgrims The Great Thanksgiving Hoax The Pilgrims’ Real Thanksgiving Lesson How Capitalism Saved America The REAL Thanksgiving Story Giving Thanks for Lessons Learned The Plymouth Experiment Obviously, one can guess which ones we are the most familiar with. The truth is, we’ve known for 400 years that charity and sharing can only be achieved through voluntary, subjective human action, not by Government fiat. If Governor Bradford found that out...why are our leaders trying it over and over again, centuries later? THANKSGIVING - Plymouth Rock's Story Did you know that the first [Plymouth Colony Pilgrim's] Thanksgiving was a celebration of the triumph of private property and individual initiative? William Bradford was the governor of the original Pilgrim colony, founded at Plymouth in 1621. The colony was first organized on a communal basis, as their financiers required. Land was owned in common. The Pilgrims farmed communally, too, following the "from each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs" precept. The results were disastrous. Communism didn't work any better 400 years ago than it does today. By 1623, the colony had suffered serious losses. Starvation was imminent. Bradford realized that the communal system encouraged and rewarded waste and laziness and inefficiency, and destroyed individual initiative. Desperate, he abolished it. He distributed private plots of land among the surviving Pilgrims, encouraging them to plant early and farm as individuals, not collectively. The results: a bountiful early harvest that saved the colonies. After the harvest, the Pilgrims celebrated with a day of Thanksgiving -- on August 9th. Unfortunately, William Bradford's diaries -- in which he recorded the failure of the collectivist system and the triumph of private enterprise -- were lost for many years. When Thanksgiving was later made a national holiday, the present November date was chosen. And the lesson the Pilgrims so painfully learned was, alas, not made a part of the holiday. Happily, Bradford's diaries were later rediscovered. They're available today in paperback. They tell the real story of Thanksgiving -- how private property and individual initiative saved the Pilgrims. This Thanksgiving season, one of the many things I'm thankful for is our free market system (imperfectly realized as it is). And I'm also grateful that there are increasing numbers of Americans who are learning the importance of free markets, and who are working to replace government coercion with marketplace cooperation here in America and around the world. Paul Schmidt PS: A special thanks to long-time Advocate volunteer Cris Everett, who told us about this neglected bit of history several years ago, and who celebrates Thanksgiving on -- you guessed it -- August 9th. -- copied from http://FreedomKeys.com/thanksgiving.htm which was copied from the Nov. 20, 1997 issue of THE LIBERATOR ONLINE at http://www.theadvocates.org/liberator/vol-02-num-21.htm May you and yours have a safe, blessed, and happy Thanksgiving.
|
|
Last Updated on Thursday, 24 November 2011 16:23 |
|
Written by The ACP
|
|
Friday, 11 November 2011 15:34 |
 |
|
Last Updated on Friday, 11 November 2011 15:38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 1 of 24 |